Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and safety of long-term macrolide therapy for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
Respiratory investigation [Respir Investig] 2024 Nov; Vol. 62 (6), pp. 1079-1087. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 25. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Long-term macrolide therapy for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) can play a significant role. However, such data are insufficient regarding the efficacy against severe exacerbation and adverse effects, including the emergence of macrolide-resistant pathogens and prolonged macrolide use beyond 1 year.<br />Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies comparing the efficacy and safety of macrolides and placebo in adult patients with NCFB were screened on April 10, 2024. The primary outcome was severe exacerbation frequency.<br />Results: Ten RCTs ≤1 year study durations were included. Most studies mainly included patients with a history of >2 exacerbations. Macrolides had a tendency to reduce the frequency of severe exacerbations compared with placebo (odds ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25-1.18). Macrolides significantly reduced the frequency of exacerbations (rate ratio = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.48-0.69), prolonged the time to first exacerbation (rate ratio = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.30-0.55), improved the changes in SGRQ scores [mean difference (MD) = -3.99, 95% CI = -4.63-3.44] and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD = -2.30, 95% CI = 0.26-4.33), and reduced sputum volume (gram) (MD = -7.44, 95% CI = -9.15-5.74). Additionally, macrolides did not increase drug-related adverse events leading to discontinuation. Qualitative SR of pathogens indicated macrolides might increase the number of macrolide-resistant oropharyngeal and sputum pathogens and the emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.<br />Conclusions: Our results support macrolide therapy for patients with NCFB. Studies with an observation period of >1 year or those focusing on patients with/without a minimal exacerbation history are required to determine the long-term effects on patients with NCFB.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Treatment Outcome
Time Factors
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Disease Progression
Observational Studies as Topic
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Bronchiectasis drug therapy
Macrolides administration & dosage
Macrolides adverse effects
Macrolides therapeutic use
Anti-Bacterial Agents administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2212-5353
- Volume :
- 62
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Respiratory investigation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39326270
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resinv.2024.09.004