Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and Toxicity of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from the U.S. Expanded-Access Program and Comparisons with Phase 3 VISION Data.

Authors :
Murthy V
Voter AF
Nguyen K
Allen-Auerbach M
Chen L
Caputo S
Ledet E
Akerele A
Moradi Tuchayi A
Lawhn-Heath C
Wang T
Carducci MA
Pomper MG
Paller CJ
Czernin J
Solnes LB
Hope TA
Sartor O
Calais J
Gafita A
Source :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine [J Nucl Med] 2024 Nov 01; Vol. 65 (11), pp. 1740-1744. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 01.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The phase 3 VISION trial demonstrated that [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) in prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who progressed on taxane-based chemotherapy and androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The U.S. expanded-access program (EAP; NCT04825652) was opened to provide access to [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 for eligible patients until regulatory approval was obtained. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP and compare the results with those from the VISION trial. Methods: Patients enrolled in the EAP at 4 institutions in the United States with available toxicity and outcome data were included. Outcome measures included OS, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) of at least 50%, and incidences of toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Differences in baseline characteristics, outcome data, and toxicity between the EAP and VISION were evaluated using t testing of proportions and survival analyses. Results: In total, 117 patients with mCRPC who received [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP between May 2021 and March 2022 were eligible and included in this analysis. Patients enrolled in the EAP were more heavily pretreated with ARSI (≥2 ARSI regimens: 70% vs. 46%; P < 0.001) and had worse performance status at baseline (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2: 19% vs. 7%; P < 0.001) than VISION patients. EAP and VISION patients had similar levels of grade 3 or higher anemia (18% vs. 13%; P = 0.15), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 8%; P = 0.13), and neutropenia (3% vs. 3%; P = 0.85) and similar PSA RRs (42% vs. 46%; P = 0.50) and OS (median: 15.1 vs. 15.3 mo; P > 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who received [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 within the EAP were later in their disease trajectory than VISION patients. Patients enrolled in the EAP achieved similar PSA RRs and OS and had a safety profile similar to that of the VISION trial patients.<br /> (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-5667
Volume :
65
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39327018
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267816