Back to Search Start Over

CD16+ as predictive marker for early relapse in aggressive B-NHL/DLBCL patients.

Authors :
Zöphel S
Küchler N
Jansky J
Hoxha C
Schäfer G
Weise JJ
Vialle J
Kaschek L
Stopper G
Eichler H
Yildiz D
Moter A
Wendel P
Ullrich E
Schormann C
Rixecker T
Cetin O
Neumann F
Orth P
Bewarder M
Hoth M
Thurner L
Schwarz EC
Source :
Molecular cancer [Mol Cancer] 2024 Sep 28; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 210. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 28.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Assessing the prognosis of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma mainly relies on a clinical risk score (IPI). Standard first-line therapies are based on a chemo-immunotherapy with rituximab, which mediates CD16-dependent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). We phenotypically and functionally analyzed blood samples from 46 patients focusing on CD16+ NK cells, CD16+ T cells and CD16+ monocytes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves show a superior progression-free survival (PFS) for patients having more than 1.6% CD16+ T cells (p = 0.02; HR = 0.13 (0.007-0.67)) but an inferior PFS having more than 10.0% CD16+ monocytes (p = 0.0003; HR = 16.0 (3.1-291.9)) at diagnosis. Surprisingly, no correlation with NK cells was found. The increased risk of relapse in the presence of > 10.0% CD16+ monocytes is reversed by the simultaneous occurrence of > 1.6% CD16+ T cells. The unexpectedly strong protective function of CD16+ T cells could be explained by their high antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity as quantified by real-time killing assays and single-cell imaging. The combined analysis of CD16+ monocytes (> 10%) and CD16+ T cells (< 1.6%) provided a strong model with a Harrell's C index of 0.80 and a very strong power of 0.996 even with our sample size of 46 patients. CD16 assessment in the initial blood analysis is thus a precise marker for early relapse prediction.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-4598
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Molecular cancer
Publication Type :
Editorial & Opinion
Accession number :
39342291
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-024-02123-7