Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical impact of sex differences and procedural setting in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
- Source :
-
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions [Cardiovasc Revasc Med] 2024 Sep 24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 24. - Publication Year :
- 2024
- Publisher :
- Ahead of Print
-
Abstract
- Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established treatment for symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. Yet, the impact of sex differences and public vs. private procedural setting on TAVI outcomes remain uncertain.<br />Methods: The RIBAC-NT (Brazilian Registry for Evaluation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes) dataset included 3194 TAVI patients from 2009 to 2021. This retrospective analysis explored disparities in baseline characteristics, procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratifying patients by sex and procedural setting. Temporal trends were also investigated.<br />Results: We included 1551 (49 %) female and 1643 (51 %) male patients. Women were older (83 [78-87] vs. 81 [75-85] years; p < 0.01) but had a lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus (30.2 % vs. 36.3 %, p < 0.01) and coronary artery disease (39.0 % vs. 52.2 %, p < 0.01). However, women had a 3-fold higher higher risk of life-threatening bleeding (6.1 % vs. 2.4 %, p < 0.01). Women presented higher procedural and in-hospital mortality rates (4.4 % vs. 2.5 % and 7.7 % vs. 4.5 %, all p < 0.01, respectively). Although public hospitals presented ~2-fold higher procedural mortality rate compared with private settings (5.0 % vs. 2.7 %, p < 0.01), after multivariable analysis procedural setting was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality.<br />Conclusions: Women had higher procedural and in-hospital mortality rates after TAVI as compared with men, while facing higher life-threatening bleeding and adverse events rates. Although public hospitals exhibited higher mortality rates than private centers, procedural setting was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. de Brito has served as proctor for Edwards LifeSciences and Medtronic. Drs Carvalho, Sarmento-Leite, Mangione, and Lemos have served as proctor for Medtronic. Dr. Ribeiro has served as proctor for Edwards LifeSciences. Dr. Grube has served as proctor for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr. Abizaid has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Boston Scientific.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1878-0938
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39362818
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.014