Propensity score-matched analysis comparing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and image-guided percutaneous cryoablation for cT1 renal cell carcinoma.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and image-guided percutaneous cryoablation (IG-PCA) for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 679 patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma treated with RAPN or IG-PCA between 2012 and 2021. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic analysis to adjust for imbalances in baseline characteristics. We compared oncological and functional outcomes between the 2 treatment groups.
Results: Following the matching process, 108 patients were included in each group. No patient in the RAPN group developed local recurrence. In the IG-PCA group, three patients experienced local tumor progression. The patients underwent salvage thermal ablations by the secondary technique; 2 underwent IG-PCA and 1 underwent microwave ablation, resulting in a local control rate of 100%. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of 5-year recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival (log-rank test; P = 0.11, P = 0.64, and P = 0.17, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the 2 treatments in major and overall complication rates (P = 0.75 and P = 0.82, respectively). Both groups showed similar rates of less than 10% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline at 12 months post-treatment and 5-year renal function preservation rates (P = 0.88 and P = 0.38, respectively).
Conclusions: IG-PCA demonstrated oncological outcomes comparable to those of RAPN. RAPN addressed the disadvantages of conventional procedures and allowed for safety outcomes comparable to IG-PCA.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)