Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy, Safety and Mechanistic Impact of a Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic.

Authors :
Spahillari A
Cohen LP
Lin C
Liu Y
Tringale A
Sheppard KE
Ko C
Khairnar R
Williamson KM
Wasfy JH
Scott NS
Paquette C
Greene SJ
Fonarow GC
Januzzi JL Jr
Source :
JACC. Heart failure [JACC Heart Fail] 2024 Oct 09. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 09.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Although clinical evidence supports rapid institution of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF), in actual practice, there remain large gaps in adherence to guideline recommendations. Recent data support safety and efficacy of rapid GDMT implementation; however, rapid GDMT deployment within a general cardiology environment remains unexplored.<br />Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a GDMT clinic within a general cardiology practice relative to usual care, the impact on prescription of GDMT, HF symptoms, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of remodeling.<br />Methods: Individuals with HF with an abnormal ejection fraction (<50%) referred to the GDMT clinic underwent rapid GDMT titration with close monitoring of clinical data. Rates of GDMT prescription were compared with a matched reference group. Patients underwent echocardiography at baseline and after GDMT clinic completion.<br />Results: A total of 114 persons were treated in GDMT clinic. The mean age was 67.6 ± 14.6 years, and 32 (28%) were women. Among those referred, 100 (87.7%) had no contraindications for 4-drug GDMT. From baseline to clinic completion (median 15.8 weeks [Q1-Q3: 10.7-23.0 weeks]), patients without medication contraindications experienced significant increases in 4-drug GDMT use (from 21% to 88%; P < 0.001); of 4-drug GDMT recipients, 92% received angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. GDMT clinic participants achieved higher medication doses than those in usual care, with greater achievement of ≥50% target dose of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (52% vs 8%), beta-blocker (78% vs 6.2%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (98% vs 15.6%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (92% vs 6.2%). Target doses of all 4 drugs were reached in nearly 1 in 4 participants. HF symptoms improved (94% to 75% NYHA functional class II/III; P < 0.001) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration decreased (median 587 to 534 ng/L; P = 0.03) despite loop diuretic reduction. Additionally, we observed an absolute 6% LVEF increase (from 37% [Q1-Q3: 31%-41%] to 43% [Q1-Q3: 38%-53%]; P < 0.001) and substantial decrease in moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. GDMT titration was well-tolerated.<br />Conclusions: Rapid GDMT implementation via an outpatient GDMT clinic was effective, safe, and associated with improvement in key clinical parameters. The more widespread role of GDMT clinics to improve HF care warrants further study.<br />Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Data analysis supported by an unrestricted grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Dr Cohen has a board position with Kento Health Inc. Dr Khairnar is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Dr Williamson was an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation at the time that this study was conducted and the analyses were completed. Dr Scott has received research support from the REBIRTH study and HOPE registries; and has received consulting income from Mediflix. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards or as consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corcept Therapeutics, Corteria Pharmaceuticals, CSL Vifor, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, scPharmaceuticals, Tricog Health, and Urovant Pharmaceuticals; and has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Lexicon, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Fonarow has consulted for Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Januzzi has a board position with Imbria Pharmaceuticals; has received grant support from Abbott, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals, has received consulting income from Abbott Diagnostics, Beckman-Coulter, Jana Care, Janssen, Novartis, Prevencio, Quidel, and Roche Diagnostics; and serves on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, CVRx, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Roche Diagnostics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2213-1787
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Heart failure
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39387769
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.017