Back to Search Start Over

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC).

Authors :
Gillessen S
Turco F
Davis ID
Efstathiou JA
Fizazi K
James ND
Shore N
Small E
Smith M
Sweeney CJ
Tombal B
Zilli T
Agarwal N
Antonarakis ES
Aparicio A
Armstrong AJ
Bastos DA
Attard G
Axcrona K
Ayadi M
Beltran H
Bjartell A
Blanchard P
Bourlon MT
Briganti A
Bulbul M
Buttigliero C
Caffo O
Castellano D
Castro E
Cheng HH
Chi KN
Clarke CS
Clarke N
de Bono JS
De Santis M
Duran I
Efstathiou E
Ekeke ON
El Nahas TIH
Emmett L
Fanti S
Fatiregun OA
Feng FY
Fong PCC
Fonteyne V
Fossati N
George DJ
Gleave ME
Gravis G
Halabi S
Heinrich D
Herrmann K
Hofman MS
Hope TA
Horvath LG
Hussain MHA
Jereczek-Fossa BA
Jones RJ
Joshua AM
Kanesvaran R
Keizman D
Khauli RB
Kramer G
Loeb S
Mahal BA
Maluf FC
Mateo J
Matheson D
Matikainen MP
McDermott R
McKay RR
Mehra N
Merseburger AS
Morgans AK
Morris MJ
Mrabti H
Mukherji D
Murphy DG
Murthy V
Mutambirwa SBA
Nguyen PL
Oh WK
Ost P
O'Sullivan JM
Padhani AR
Parker C
Poon DMC
Pritchard CC
Rabah DM
Rathkopf D
Reiter RE
Renard-Penna R
Ryan CJ
Saad F
Sade JP
Sandhu S
Sartor OA
Schaeffer E
Scher HI
Sharifi N
Skoneczna IA
Soule HR
Spratt DE
Srinivas S
Sternberg CN
Suzuki H
Taplin ME
Thellenberg-Karlsson C
Tilki D
Türkeri LN
Uemura H
Ürün Y
Vale CL
Vapiwala N
Walz J
Yamoah K
Ye D
Yu EY
Zapatero A
Omlin A
Source :
European urology [Eur Urol] 2024 Oct 10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 10.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background and Objective: Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024.<br />Methods: Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members ("panellists").<br />Key Findings and Limitations: Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis.<br />Conclusions and Clinical Implications: The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-7560
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39394013
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017