Back to Search Start Over

Hybrid ultra-high and conventional dose rate treatments with electrons and photons for the clinical transfer of FLASH-RT to deep-seated targets: A treatment planning study.

Authors :
Böhlen TT
Zeverino M
Germond JF
Kinj R
Schiappacasse L
Bochud F
Herrera F
Bourhis J
Moeckli R
Source :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2024 Dec; Vol. 201, pp. 110576. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 11.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the dosimetric feasibility and plan quality of hybrid ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron and conventional dose rate (CDR) photon (HUC) radiotherapy for treating deep-seated tumours with FLASH-RT.<br />Methods: HUC treatment planning was conducted optimizing a broad UHDR electron beam (between 20-250 MeV) combined with a CDR VMAT for a glioblastoma, a pancreatic cancer, and a prostate cancer case. HUC plans were based on clinical prescription and fractionation schemes and compared against clinically delivered plans. Considering a HUC boost treatment for the glioblastoma consisting of a 15-Gy-single-fraction UHDR electron boost supplemented with VMAT, two scenarios for FLASH sparing were assessed using FLASH-modifying-factor-weighted doses.<br />Results: For all three patient cases, HUC treatment plans demonstrated comparable dosimetric quality to clinical plans, with similar PTV coverage (V <subscript>95%</subscript> within 0.5 %), homogeneity, and critical OAR-sparing. At the same time, HUC plans delivered a substantial portion of the dose to the PTV (D <subscript>median</subscript> of 50-69 %) and surrounding tissues at UHDR. For the HUC boost treatment of the glioblastoma, the first FLASH sparing scenario showed a moderate FLASH sparing magnitude (10 % for D <subscript>2%,PTV</subscript> ) for the 15-Gy UHDR electron boost, while the second scenario indicated a more substantial sparing of brain tissues inside and outside the PTV (32 % for D <subscript>2%,PTV</subscript> , 31 % for D <subscript>2%,Brain</subscript> ).<br />Conclusions: From a planning perspective, HUC treatments represent a feasible approach for delivering dosimetrically conformal UHDR treatments, potentially mitigating technical challenges associated with delivering conformal FLASH-RT for deep-seated tumours. While further research is needed to optimize HUC fractionation and delivery schemes for specific patient cohorts, HUC treatments offer a promising avenue for the clinical transfer of FLASH-RT.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0887
Volume :
201
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39395673
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110576