Optimal electrode placements for localizing premature ventricular contractions using a single dipole cardiac source model.

Introduction: The inverse problem of electrocardiography describes non-invasively the electrical activity of the heart using potential recordings from tens to hundreds of torso electrodes. Regrettably, the use of numerous electrodes poses a challenge to its integration into routine clinical practice.
Methods: Optimal electrode placements, ranging from 8 to 112 electrodes, were derived from the singular values of the transfer matrices computed for all feasible positions of a single dipole cardiac source across 12 patients with unique geometrical characteristics from the Bratislava dataset. The transfer matrices were computed using the boundary element method. Subsequently, these optimal electrode placements were used to compute the inverse solution for localizing the origin of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) with a single dipole cardiac source. The localization error (LE) was computed as the Euclidean distance between the true PVC origin, obtained through an invasive radiofrequency ablation, and the inverse solution. This enabled a direct comparison of LE computed for each optimal electrode placement with that from the full 128-electrode set.
Results: Results showed that subsets of electrodes, particularly 32 to 112, provided comparable localization accuracy (LE of 30.5 ± 15.0 mm and 26.8 ± 12.6 mm) to the full 128-electrode set (LE of 27.2 ± 11.5 mm). High errors were observed with 8 and 16-electrode placements (LE of 48.6 ± 21.3 mm and 41.0 ± 18.3 mm).
Conclusion: Precise PVC localization can be achieved using strategically positioned subsets of electrodes, offering advantages in reduced preparation time, enhanced patient comfort, and improved cost-effectiveness of body surface potential mapping.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)