Significantly less wear of UHMWPE rubbing against pyrocarbon than against CoCr.

The history of joint replacement can be framed as a battle to reduce wear. Pyrocarbon has been shown to be a low wear material, but can low wear against an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) counterface be achieved? To investigate this research question, a 50-station, clinically validated wear screening machine was used. Half the stations tested UHMWPE pins against pyrocarbon discs, and half the stations tested UHMWPE pins against cobalt chromium (CoCr) discs. The test rig ran at 1Hz, the nominal contact stress was 2.07 MPa, and testing ran to 5 million cycles. A biomimetic lubricant was used, it was replaced every 500,000 cycles. At the end of testing, the UHMWPE pins rubbing against pyrocarbon discs had a statistically significant reduced wear, compared with the UHMWPE pins rubbing against CoCr discs (p ≤ 0.01). Analysis of the discs at the end of testing showed greater adherence of phospholipids on the pyrocarbon discs than the CoCr discs. In turn, it was also seen that far less UHMWPE was attached to the pyrocarbon discs than to the CoCr discs. Based on this evidence, it is suggested that pyrocarbon surfaces are associated with reduced adhesive wear of UHMWPE compared with CoCr surfaces. In addition, at the end of testing, the CoCr discs were found to be significantly rougher than the pyrocarbon discs. Therefore, pyrocarbon maintained a smoother surface than CoCr, likely meaning that abrasive wear of UHMWPE was reduced compared with CoCr.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Thomas J Joyce reports financial support and equipment, drugs, or supplies were provided by Tornier SAS. Michel Hassler, Ghassan Ouenzerfi reports a relationship with Tornier SAS that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)