Back to Search Start Over

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Trauma Resiliency Scale (tRS-18).

Authors :
Li S
Hao C
Ren J
Source :
BMC psychiatry [BMC Psychiatry] 2024 Oct 28; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 743. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 28.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Trauma is a prevalent issue in public health, where individuals who experience physical injuries are also at risk of compromised mental health. Psychological resilience is considered a positive indicator that can predict the prognosis of trauma patients throughout their traumatic experiences. Currently, there is a lack of tools in China for measuring the psychological resilience of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Trauma Resiliency Scale (tRS-18) into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity in China.<br />Methods: The Trauma Resiliency Scale (tRS-18) was translated into a Chinese version suitable for the Chinese language environment using the Brislin translation model. A convenience sampling method was used to select 588 trauma patients as study subjects. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, 14-day test-retest reliability, and split-half reliability. Validity was examined through the content validity index, structural validity, and convergent validity. Structural validity was specifically evaluated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).<br />Results: The total variance explained by the single-factor model in the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Chinese version of the tRS-18 was 62.048%, and the factor loading of each item exceeded 0.4. The results of the CFA indicated that the model demonstrated a favorable fit index (X <superscript>2</superscript> /df = 1.620; RMSEA = 0.046; SRMR = 0.026; NFI = 0.945; CFI = 0.978; GFI = 0.927; TLI = 0.975; IFI = 0.978). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the reliability index was 0.963, the test-retest reliability was 0.970, and the split-half reliability was 0.964, which were all within the reference value range.<br />Conclusion: The Chinese version of the tRS-18 has good validity and reliability and can be used as an assessment tool for trauma resilience in trauma patients.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-244X
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC psychiatry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39468545
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06166-4