Back to Search Start Over

Intraosseous or Intravenous Vascular Access for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors :
Vallentin MF
Granfeldt A
Klitgaard TL
Mikkelsen S
Folke F
Christensen HC
Povlsen AL
Petersen AH
Winther S
Frilund LW
Meilandt C
Holmberg MJ
Winther KB
Bach A
Dissing TH
Terkelsen CJ
Christensen S
Kirkegaard Rasmussen L
Mortensen LR
Loldrup ML
Elkmann T
Nielsen AG
Runge C
Klæstrup E
Holm JH
Bak M
Nielsen LR
Pedersen M
Kjærgaard-Andersen G
Hansen PM
Brøchner AC
Christensen EF
Nielsen FM
Nissen CG
Bjørn JW
Burholt P
Obling LER
Holle SLD
Russell L
Alstrøm H
Hestad S
Fogtmann TH
Buciek JUH
Jakobsen K
Krag M
Sandgaard M
Sindberg B
Andersen LW
Source :
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 2025 Jan 23; Vol. 392 (4), pp. 349-360. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 31.
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death worldwide. Establishing vascular access is critical for administering guideline-recommended drugs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Both the intraosseous route and the intravenous route are used routinely, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear.<br />Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of initial attempts at intraosseous or intravenous vascular access in adults who had nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was a sustained return of spontaneous circulation. Key secondary outcomes were survival at 30 days and survival at 30 days with a favorable neurologic outcome, defined by a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability).<br />Results: Among 1506 patients who underwent randomization, 1479 were included in the primary analysis (731 in the intraosseous-access group and 748 in the intravenous-access group). The successful establishment of vascular access within two attempts occurred in 669 patients (92%) assigned to the intraosseous-access group and in 595 patients (80%) assigned to the intravenous-access group. Sustained return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 221 patients (30%) in the intraosseous-access group and in 214 patients (29%) in the intravenous-access group (risk ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.24; P = 0.49). At 30 days, 85 patients (12%) in the intraosseous-access group and 75 patients (10%) in the intravenous-access group were alive (risk ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.56); a favorable neurologic outcome at 30 days occurred in 67 patients (9%) and 59 patients (8%), respectively (risk ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.62). Prespecified adverse events were uncommon.<br />Conclusions: There was no significant difference in sustained return of spontaneous circulation between initial intraosseous and intravenous vascular access in adults who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and others; IVIO EU Clinical Trials Register number, 2022-500744-38-00; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05205031.).<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1533-4406
Volume :
392
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39480221
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2407616