Patients with Growth-Related Disorders and Caregivers Prefer the Somapacitan Device to the Somatrogon Device: Results from a Randomized Crossover Study Assessing Device Preference and Ease of Use Following Simulated Injections.

Purpose: Adherence to growth hormone treatment is known to affect growth outcomes. Both device preference and ease of use have been shown to affect treatment adherence. In this study, we assessed device preference and ease of use with two long-acting growth hormones, somapacitan (Sogroya ^® , Novo Nordisk A/S) and somatrogon (Ngenla ^® , Pfizer).
Patients and Methods: In a randomized, crossover study conducted between September 20 and November 2, 2023, we recruited 33 adolescents with a growth-related disorder, and 37 caregivers, at six locations in the United States. Each participant was trained in the use of both devices and asked to perform a simulated injection. Device training time, preparation and injection time, and injection completeness were recorded. Participants also completed the Device Handling and Preference Questionnaire (DHPAQ) to indicate their device preference and ease of use opinions. Following conclusion of the "standard" visit, 10 adolescents and 10 caregivers were randomly selected to participate in a sub-study to validate the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehension of the DHPAQ.
Results: The majority of participants (84.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 74;92) preferred the somapacitan device to the somatrogon device (p < 0.0001). Almost all (98.6%; 95% CI: 92;100) participants answered that the somapacitan device was easy or very easy to use, while three-quarters (74.3%; 95% CI: 62;84) answered the same for the somatrogon device. Average training and injection times were lower for the somapacitan device than for the somatrogon device. Also, more patients successfully completed the injection with the somapacitan device than with the somatrogon device (97.1% vs 92.9%). Cognitive debriefing interviews indicated the DHPAQ was relevant, comprehensive, and fully comprehended.
Conclusion: The somapacitan device was preferred to the somatrogon device by a majority of participants. More participants considered the somapacitan device to be easy or very easy to use than the somatrogon device.
Competing Interests: Shahid Akhtar, Birgitte Berg, Johan Medina, Sophie Hamilton, Nicky Kelepouris, Jesper Skov Neergaard, Claus Sværke, Gitte Ter-Borch, and Niklas Kahr Rasmussen are employees of, and hold stocks in, Novo Nordisk. Maya Gonczi and Emily Hildebrand are employees of Research Collective, which received financial compensation from Novo Nordisk for performing the research reported in the manuscript. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
(© 2024 Akhtar et al.)