Back to Search Start Over

Preoperative assessment of pancreatic cancer with [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR versus [ 18 F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective preliminary study.

Authors :
Zhang Z
Guo S
Su W
Pan G
Cao K
Jiang H
Zhang L
Cheng C
Jin G
Zuo C
Source :
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging [Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging] 2025 Feb; Vol. 52 (3), pp. 1017-1027. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 07.
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer and compare it with that of [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).<br />Methods: Thirty-one patients with pancreatic cancer underwent preoperative [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR, [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT, and CECT imaging. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed two sets of images (set 1, [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR; set 2, [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT) and reached a consensus on tumour resectability, N staging (N0 or N positive) and M staging (M0 or M1). Based on the above indices, the resectability of the tumour was determined according to a five-point scale. Clinical, operative, and pathological findings were used as a reference standard to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging sets via the McNemar test.<br />Results: The diagnostic performance of [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was not significantly different from that of [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging in the assessment of tumour resectability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.854 vs. 0.775, p = 0.192), N staging [accuracy: 82.4% (14 of 17 patients) vs. 58.8% (10 of 17 patients), p = 0.125] and M staging [accuracy: 100% (31 of 31 patients) vs. 90.3% (28 of 31 patients), p = 0.250]. However, compared with [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging, [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging changed the M stage in three patients by upstaging from M0 to M1 in 2 patients and downstaging from M1 to M0 in 2 patients. In 13 patients with liver metastases, the number of liver metastases detected via [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was greater than that detected via [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging (324 vs. 240). In 3 patients with peritoneal metastases, [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging detected more peritoneal metastases than did [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging.<br />Conclusions: [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging has diagnostic accuracy comparable to [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT in terms of preoperative staging and assessment of resectability in pancreatic cancer; additionally, it exhibits superior capability in detecting liver and peritoneal metastases. Consequently, [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR has the potential to become a one-stop imaging tool for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer.<br />Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Institutional Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Changhai Hospital, CHEC2021-071). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study for publication. Consent for publication: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in this article. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1619-7089
Volume :
52
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39508900
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06943-z