Back to Search Start Over

Pilot implementation and qualitative evaluation of a financial hardship screening among Native American patients with cancer.

Authors :
Janitz AE
Anderson-Buettner AS
Madison SD
Doescher MP
Nipp R
Buckner S
Rhoades DA
Source :
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer [Support Care Cancer] 2024 Nov 15; Vol. 32 (12), pp. 792. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 15.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Native American (NA) patients with cancer are at increased risk of financial hardship due to lack of private health insurance coverage, medical comorbidities, and higher poverty rates. We aimed to implement and evaluate a pilot financial hardship screening (FHS) program among NA patients with cancer.<br />Methods: In 2022, we piloted the implementation of FHS among adult NA patients with cancer referred by NA-specific health facilities to an NCI-designated cancer center using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) tool. We dichotomized COST-FACIT scores as mild/no hardship (26-44) and moderate/severe hardship (≤ 25). To evaluate the implementation, we conducted interviews with patients and clinical staff who participated in the screening process. We thematically analyzed interview transcriptions using inductive and deductive coding to identify themes.<br />Results: Of 42 patients completing FHS, 76.2% reported moderate/severe hardship. Ten patients and four clinical staff (1 physician, 3 NA navigation staff) completed interviews. We identified three themes: (1) FHS perceptions and intervention experiences, (2) FHS efficacy and opportunities for expansion, and (3) nuances for NA patients and patient-related factors. Patients expressed positive experiences with FHS, including identifying financial challenges, but preferences regarding timing varied. Staff reported logistic and sustainability challenges in implementing FHS. However, clinic staff reported positive experiences with the tool, interactions with patients, and the resulting supportive care referrals.<br />Conclusion: Implementation of FHS for NA patients with cancer was well received by patients and staff and was perceived by both groups as facilitating efforts to address financial hardship. Measures to improve staffing and sustainability are needed to enable broader implementation.<br />Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1433-7339
Volume :
32
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39543006
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08995-1