Back to Search Start Over

NSW cannabis medicines advisory service retrospective enquiry analysis to inform clinical guidance resource development.

Authors :
Graham M
Eden E
Maddison K
Lago L
Allingham S
Lucas CJ
Schneider J
Martin JH
Source :
Neuropsychopharmacology reports [Neuropsychopharmacol Rep] 2025 Mar; Vol. 45 (1), pp. e12498. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 17.
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Background: An innovative New South Wales government funded statewide Cannabis Medicines Advisory Service (CMAS) operated between January 2018 and June 2022. The service provided comprehensive patient-specific and evidence-based information to support health professionals in prescribing and patient care decisions. This study aimed to describe real-world data collected by CMAS.<br />Methods: A sub-set of de-identified, patient-specific enquiries collected between January 2021 and June 2022 (n = 123/567; 21.7%) were analyzed using R version 4.2.1. Diagnosis, indication, and comorbidities were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology.<br />Results: Most patient-specific enquiries from medical practitioners were from general practitioners (n = 103/123; 83.7%). Female (n = 53/123; 43.1%) and male (n = 59/123; 48.0%) patients were similarly represented. Sex was not specified for 8.9% (n = 11/123) of patients. The mean age of patients was 52.1 years (range <10-90). The most common three diagnoses were osteoarthritis, anxiety, and chronic pain. Indications that were most frequently reported included chronic pain, anxiety, back pain, non-neuropathic pain, and insomnia. Comedications were most commonly non-opioid and opioid analgesics and antidepressants. Most practitioners were considering prescribing a cannabidiol (CBD) product for their patient. Cannabinoid composition selection guidance provided by CMAS was predominantly (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) THC:CBD ~1:1, followed by CBD-only products. CMAS was contacted by health professionals regarding the management of potential adverse events for five patients.<br />Conclusion: The findings of this study shed light on the information medical practitioners were seeking to inform their clinical decision-making about medical cannabis and can inform the development of clinical guidance resources.<br /> (© 2024 The Author(s). Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2574-173X
Volume :
45
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neuropsychopharmacology reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39551707
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12498