Functional evidence that S-nitroso-L-cysteine may be a candidate carotid body neurotransmitter.

The primary objective of the present study is to provide further evidence that the endogenous S-nitrosothiol, S-nitroso-L-cysteine (L-CSNO), plays an essential role in signaling the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) in rodents. Key findings were that (1) injection of L-CSNO (50 nmol/kg, IV) caused a pronounced increase in frequency of breathing (Freq), tidal volume (TV) and minute ventilation (MV) in naïve C57BL/6 mice, whereas injection of D-CSNO (50 nmol/kg, IV) elicited minimal responses; (2) L-CSNO elicited minor responses in (a) C57BL/6 mice with bilateral carotid sinus nerve transection (CSNX), (b) C57BL/6 mice treated neonatally with capsaicin (CAP) to eliminate small-diameter C-fibers, and (c) C57BL/6 mice receiving continuous infusion of L-CSNO receptor antagonists, S-methyl-L-cysteine and S-ethyl-L-cysteine (L-SMC + L-SEC, both at 5 μmol/kg/min, IV); and (3) injection of S-nitroso-L-glutathione (L-GSNO, 50 nmol/kg, IV) elicited pronounced ventilatory responses that were not inhibited by L-SMC + L-SEC. Subsequent exposure of naïve C57BL/6 mice to a hypoxic gas challenge (HXC; 10% O ₂ , 90% N ₂ ) elicited pronounced increases in Freq, TV and MV that were subject to roll-off. These HXC responses were markedly reduced in CSNX, CAP, and L-SMC + L-SEC-infused C57BL/6 mice. Subsequent exposure of all C57BL/6 mice (naïve, CSNX, CAP, and L-SMC + L-SEC) to a hypercapnic gas challenge (5% CO ₂ , 21% O ₂ , 74% N ₂ ) elicited similar robust increases in Freq, TV and MV. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that an endogenous factor with pharmacodynamic properties similar to those of L-CSNO, rather than L-GSNO, mediates the HVR in male C57BL/6 mice.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing interest The authors declare that this study received funding from Galleon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and that Santhosh M. Baby was employed by the company Galleon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The leadership of the company was not directly involved in this study as a commercial entity. Only the principal scientists of the company were involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, and the decision to submit it for publication. The remaining authors declare that the research described in this manuscript was performed in the complete absence of commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)