Multi-population GWAS detects robust marker associations in a newly established six-rowed winter barley breeding program.

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a powerful tool for identifying marker-trait associations that can accelerate breeding progress. Yet, its power is typically constrained in newly established breeding programs where large phenotypic and genotypic datasets have not yet accumulated. Expanding the dataset by inclusion of data from well-established breeding programs with many years of phenotyping and genotyping can potentially address this problem. In this study we performed single- and multi-population GWAS on heading date and lodging in four barley breeding populations with varying combinations of row-type and growth habit. Focusing on a recently established 6-rowed winter (6RW) barley population, single-population GWAS hardly resulted in any significant associations. Nevertheless, the combination of the 6RW target population with other populations in multi-population GWAS detected four and five robust candidate quantitative trait loci for heading date and lodging, respectively. Of these, three remained undetected when analysing the combined populations individually. Further, multi-population GWAS detected markers capturing a larger proportion of genetic variance in 6RW. For multi-population GWAS, we compared the findings of a univariate model (MP1) with a multivariate model (MP2). While both models surpassed single-population GWAS in power, MP2 offered a significant advantage by having more realistic assumptions while pointing towards robust marker-trait associations across populations. Additionally, comparisons of GWAS findings for MP2 and single-population GWAS allowed identification of population-specific loci. In conclusion, our study presents a promising approach to kick-start genomics-based breeding in newly established breeding populations.
Competing Interests: Competing interests: Nordic Seed A/S own and market the studied barley breeding programs. Ethics approval: All data presented in this manuscript required no ethical approval.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)