Back to Search Start Over

Intrinsic and environmental drivers of pairwise cohesion in wild Canis social groups.

Authors :
Benson JF
Keiter DA
Mahoney PJ
Allen BL
Allen L
Álvares F
Anderson ML
Barber-Meyer SM
Barocas A
Beasley JC
Behrendorff L
Belant JL
Beyer DE Jr
Boitani L
Borg BL
Boutin S
Boydston EE
Brown JL
Bump JK
Cepek JD
Chamberlain MJ
Chenaux-Ibrahim YM
Cherry SG
Ćirović D
Ciucci P
Cluff HD
Cooper SM
Crooks KR
Dupont DLJ
Fisher RN
Fortin D
Gable TD
García E
Geffen E
Gehrt SD
Gillingham M
Heard DC
Hebblewhite M
Hinton JW
Homkes AT
Howden CG
Huber D
Jackson PJ
Joly K
Kelly A
Kelly MJ
Kingdon KA
Kulkarni A
Kusak J
Kuzyk GW
Lake BC
Llaneza L
López-Bao JV
MacNulty DR
McLaren AAD
McLoughlin PD
Merrill EH
Mills KJ
Mitchell N
Moore SA
Mumma MA
Murray MH
Musiani M
Nakamura M
Neilson EW
Neufeld LM
Newsome TM
Oakleaf JK
Palacios V
Perdicas MM
Perry T
Petroelje TR
Piper CB
Prokopenko CM
Prugh LR
Riley SPD
Rio-Maior H
Roffler GH
Rollins D
Sand H
Schmiegelow FKA
Seip DR
Sorum MS
St Clair CC
Steenweg R
Strohbach MW
Tatler J
Thaker M
Thompson CA
Turner JW
Vanak AT
Vander Wal E
Wabakken P
Walter SE
Webster SC
Wheeldon TJ
Wikenros C
Windels SK
Young JK
Zabihi-Seissan S
Zimmermann B
Patterson BR
Source :
Ecology [Ecology] 2024 Dec 12, pp. e4492. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 12.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Animals within social groups respond to costs and benefits of sociality by adjusting the proportion of time they spend in close proximity to other individuals in the group (cohesion). Variation in cohesion between individuals, in turn, shapes important group-level processes such as subgroup formation and fission-fusion dynamics. Although critical to animal sociality, a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing cohesion remains a gap in our knowledge of cooperative behavior in animals. We tracked 574 individuals from six species within the genus Canis in 15 countries on four continents with GPS telemetry to estimate the time that pairs of individuals within social groups spent in close proximity and test hypotheses regarding drivers of cohesion. Pairs of social canids (Canis spp.) varied widely in the proportion of time they spent together (5%-100%) during seasonal monitoring periods relative to both intrinsic characteristics and environmental conditions. The majority of our data came from three species of wolves (gray wolves, eastern wolves, and red wolves) and coyotes. For these species, cohesion within social groups was greatest between breeding pairs and varied seasonally as the nature of cooperative activities changed relative to annual life history patterns. Across species, wolves were more cohesive than coyotes. For wolves, pairs were less cohesive in larger groups, and when suitable, small prey was present reflecting the constraints of food resources and intragroup competition on social associations. Pair cohesion in wolves declined with increased anthropogenic modification of the landscape and greater climatic variability, underscoring challenges for conserving social top predators in a changing world. We show that pairwise cohesion in social groups varies strongly both within and across Canis species, as individuals respond to changing ecological context defined by resources, competition, and anthropogenic disturbance. Our work highlights that cohesion is a highly plastic component of animal sociality that holds significant promise for elucidating ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying cooperative behavior.<br /> (© 2024 The Author(s). Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1939-9170
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39663892
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.4492