Luteolin-mediated phosphoproteomic changes in chicken splenic lymphocytes: Unraveling the detoxification mechanisms against ammonia-induced stress.

Long-term exposure to high ammonia concentrations could severely impact chicken health. On the other hand, luteolin has been shown to protect against ammonia poisoning. Although phosphorylation is critically involved in toxicity induction, the specific role of phosphorylated proteins in ammonia poisoning remains unclear. Herein, we constructed an in vitro model to study chicken ammonia poisoning and also analyzed the protective effects of luteolin. Specifically, a combined series of organic techniques such as protein extraction, enzyme digestion, modified peptide enrichment, Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis, and bioinformatics analysis were employed for a quantitative omics study of phosphorylation modification in three groups of samples. Our findings revealed thousands of Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs). The differentially expressed modified proteins were subjected to GO classification, KEGG pathway analysis, cluster analysis, and protein interaction analysis, revealing the detoxification mechanism encompassed mitochondrial maintenance, signal transduction, transcriptional regulation, and cytoskeleton regulation. In the process, mitochondria and Golgi apparatus were the key organelles. Furthermore, the AKT1/FOXO signaling pathway and Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) were the key core modifiers of the proteins. We hope that our findings will provide a theoretical basis and experimental support for future research on luteolin's detoxification mechanism against ammonia poisoning.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Has patent pending to. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)