Back to Search
Start Over
The role of artificial intelligence in standardizing global longitudinal strain measurements in echocardiography.
- Source :
-
European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice [Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract] 2024 Dec 06; Vol. 2 (4), pp. qyae130. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 06 (Print Publication: 2024). - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aims: To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) in left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) analysis as compared to conventional (Manual) and semi-automated (SemiAuto) method in echocardiography (Echo).<br />Methods and Results: GLS validation was performed on 550 standard Echo exams by expert cardiologists. The performance of a beginner cardiologist without experience of GLS analysis was assessed on a subset of 90 exams. The AI employs fully automated view selection, classification, endocardial border tracing, and calculation of GLS from an entire Echo exam, while SemiAuto requires manual chamber view selection, and Manual involves full user input. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for all three methods. Agreement of measures included Pearson's correlation (R) and Bland-Altman analysis [median bias; limits of agreement (LOA)]. With an 89% feasibility the AI showed good agreement with Manual (R = 0.92, bias = 0.7% and LOA: -3.5 to 4.8%) and with SemiAuto (r = 0.90, bias = 0.10% and LOA: -4.5 to 4%). ICCs for GLS were 1.0 for AI, 0.93 for SemiAuto, and 0.80 for Manual. After the 55th analysis, the beginner showed stable time performance with Manual (171 s), contrasting with the consistent performance of SemiAuto (85-69 s) from the beginning. The highest agreement between beginner and expert readers was achieved with AI (R = 1.00), followed by SemiAuto (R = 0.85) and Manual (R = 0.74).<br />Conclusion: Automated GLS analysis enhances efficiency and accuracy in cardiac diagnostics, particularly for novice users. Integration of automated solutions into routine clinical practice could yield more standardized results.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A.L. reports honoraria or consultancy fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Abiomed, Novartis, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer, Abbott, MSD, Corvia, Daiichi and Meril; received grant support form Edwards Lifesciences and Novartis, and owns stock options from Transverse Medical, Picardia and Filterlex. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2755-9637
- Volume :
- 2
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39712903
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae130