Back to Search
Start Over
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small and Very Small Aortic Valve Annuli: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Between Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves.
- Source :
-
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2025 Feb; Vol. 105 (3), pp. 624-632. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 24. - Publication Year :
- 2025
-
Abstract
- Background: The management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) patients with a small aortic annulus (SAA) postures a substantial challenge, increasing the risk of patient- prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and overall mortality.<br />Aims: This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of transcatheter balloon-expandable valve (BEV) versus transcatheter self-expandable valve (SEV) in SAA.<br />Methods: We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) of severe AS patients with SAA who underwent trans-femoral TAVR and enrolled to the Israeli TAVR registry between the years 2008 and 2023. SAA was defined as an aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 430 mm <superscript>2</superscript> . Since the BEV used have a smaller size cut-off, an additional analysis on very small aortic annulus (vSAA) as defined as aortic-valve annulus area ≤ 345 mm <superscript>2</superscript> was performed.<br />Results: The study included 1364 consecutive patients with SAA of (BEV n = 485; SEV n = 879) at a mean age of 82 ± 7 years, of whom the vast majority were female (83%). Propensity-matched groups comprised of 329 and 122 paired for the SAA and vSAA patients, respectively. As compared to BEV in the SAA and vSAA analyses, SEV showed lower rates of postprocedural of LBBB (32% vs. 22% and 41% vs. 22%; both p < 0.01, respectively), however, higher rates of major vascular complications (2% vs. 7% and 2% vs. 12%; both p < 0.01, respectively) and major or life-threatening bleeding but only in vSAA group (17% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.009). One-month mortality was higher in the SEV versus BEV in both SAA and vSAA comparisons (2% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.048 and 3% vs. 0%, p = 0.018; respectively). A nonsignificant trend of higher 5-year mortality was observed in univariate models, noted mainly in vSAA patients (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.385; 24% vs. 15%, p = 0.073).<br />Conclusions: The present analysis observed higher rates of major vascular complications and 1-month mortality in SAA and vSAA treated with SEV. A similar nonsignificant trend toward long-term mortality for the vSAA group was observed and should be evaluated in larger cohorts.<br /> (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Male
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Treatment Outcome
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Risk Assessment
Israel
Retrospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Severity of Illness Index
Postoperative Complications etiology
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement instrumentation
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement mortality
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Prosthesis Design
Registries
Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve physiopathology
Aortic Valve surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality
Balloon Valvuloplasty adverse effects
Hemodynamics
Propensity Score
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1522-726X
- Volume :
- 105
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39718156
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31374