Back to Search Start Over

Translating Evidence-Based Self-Management Interventions Using a Stepped-Care Approach for Patients With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design.

Authors :
Lambert S
Moodie EEM
McCusker J
Lokhorst M
Harris C
Langmuir T
Belzile E
Laizner AM
Brahim LO
Wasserman S
Chehayeb S
Vickers M
Duncan L
Esplen MJ
Maheu C
Howell D
de Raad M
Source :
Psycho-oncology [Psychooncology] 2025 Jan; Vol. 34 (1), pp. e70043.
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Background: Self-directed interventions are cost-effective for patients with cancer and their family caregivers, but barriers to use can compromise adherence and efficacy.<br />Aim: Pilot a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) to develop a time-varying dyadic self-management intervention that follows a stepped-care approach in providing different types of guidance to optimize the delivery of Coping-Together, a dyadic self-directed self-management intervention.<br />Methods: 48 patients with cancer and their caregivers were randomized in Stage 1 to: (a) Coping-Together (included a workbook and 6 booklets) or (b) Coping-Together + lay telephone guidance. At 6 weeks, change in distress level was assessed, and non-responding dyads were re-randomized in Stage 2 to (a) continue with their Stage 1 intervention or (b) be stepped-up. Benchmarks for acceptability, feasibility, and clinical significance (anxiety and quality of life (QOL)) were assessed via surveys and study logs.<br />Results: Feasibility was supported by a low refusal rate at ≤ 30% and < 10% missing data. Men and women were enrolled in at least a 40:60 ratio for caregivers, but less for patients. Recruitment was slow at 1 dyad/week. Acceptability was supported by a low attrition rate (12.5%) and with 87% of participants finding the booklets helpful. Telephone guidance in Stage 1 increased adherence to Coping-Together; however, in Stage 1, participants benefited more from the self-directed format than the guidance. All patients who were stepped-up in Stage 2 benefited from their new assignment; this trend was less clear for caregivers.<br />Significance: Findings suggest a 3-step approach to dyadic self-management support that warrants further testing.<br />Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registration #: NCT04255030.<br /> (© 2025 The Author(s). Psycho‐Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1099-1611
Volume :
34
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Psycho-oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39763142
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70043