Back to Search Start Over

Observational Study of Best Supportive Care With or Without Oral Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma at a Tertiary Center in India.

Authors :
Srivastava A
Misra S
Rastogi N
Kapoor V
Kumar S
Source :
JCO global oncology [JCO Glob Oncol] 2025 Jan; Vol. 11, pp. e2400341. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Jan 09.
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Purpose: To compare overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer receiving oral capecitabine (X) with best supportive care (BSC) and BSC alone.<br />Materials and Methods: Patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70 were accrued and assigned to either arm A or B. Assignment to these two arms was based on physician/patient discretion. Arm A received oral capecitabine 825 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> twice a day d1-14, repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles with BSC, and arm B received BSC alone. The Kaplan-Meier method computed OS and comparison was using a log-rank test. QOL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 administered at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The linear mixed-effects model was used for the longitudinal analysis of QOL.<br />Results: Between December 2020 and April 2022, 64 patients diagnosed with metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and KPS ≥70 were accrued in the study, and 32 patients were assigned to each arm. In arm A versus B, the median age was 52 versus 55 ( P = .21); the median KPS was 80 versus 70 ( P = .008). The median OS in arm A versus B was 3.4 versus 2 months ( P = .001). Grade 1-2 vomiting and diarrhea were seen in 50% versus 78% ( P = .041) and 59% versus 9.3% ( P = .01) patients in arm A versus B, respectively. Grade 1-2 hand-foot syndrome was seen in 12 (37.5%) patients in arm A. Dynamic changes showed an improvement in pain in the linear mixed model with a significant difference between the arms ( P = .011); arm A experienced a significant improvement in pain over time (arm × time P = .020). Global QOL improved over time ( P = .038) with parallel improvement between arms (arm × time P = .490).<br />Conclusion: Compared with BSC alone, patients who receive X + BSC experience an OS improvement of 1.4 months and better pain control without grade 3 toxicities or negative impact on QOL.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2687-8941
Volume :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JCO global oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39787447
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00341