Back to Search
Start Over
Biological and therapeutic implications of FGFR alterations in urothelial cancer: A systematic review from non-muscle-invasive to metastatic disease.
- Source :
-
Actas urologicas espanolas [Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)] 2025 Feb 13, pp. 501719. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Feb 13. - Publication Year :
- 2025
- Publisher :
- Ahead of Print
-
Abstract
- FGFR3 mutations are among the most frequent genomic alterations in urothelial cancer (UC) being mainly associated with the luminal papillary (LumP) subtype. With the establishment of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, the treatment of UC is now shifting more and more towards personalized medicine. A systematic review using Medline and scientific meeting records was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines to assess the potential role of FGFR inhibitors in combination with additional therapies for the management of UC. Ongoing trials were identified via a systematic search on ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of eleven full-text papers, ten congress abstracts, and 5 trials on ClinicalTrials.gov were identified. Following the BLC2001 and THOR study, erdafitinib is the only approved FGFR1-4 inhibitor for metastatic UC with susceptible FGFR2/3 alterations following platinum-based chemotherapy. According to the THOR data of cohort 2, erdafitinib should not be recommended in patients who are eligible for and have not received prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). One phase 3 trial is currently evaluating the intravesical device system (TAR210) in FGFR-altered intermediate non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (MoonRISe-1). Preclinical evidence suggests that combination-based approaches could be considered to improve the efficacy of FGFR inhibitors in patients with UC. Nine phase 1b/2 trials are focusing on the combination of FGFR inhibitors with ICIs, chemotherapy, or enfortumab vedotin. In metastatic disease, some preliminary analyses have reported promising results from these combinations (e.g. NORSE and FORT-2 trial). However, no phase 3 trial is terminated, so there is currently no level 1 evidence with long-term outcomes to support the combination of FGFR inhibitors with ICIs, chemotherapy, or targeted therapies. A better understanding of the different mechanisms of action to inhibit FGFR signaling pathways, optimal patient selection and treatment approaches is still needed.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None.<br /> (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English; Spanish; Castilian
- ISSN :
- 2173-5786
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Actas urologicas espanolas
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39955055
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501719