Back to Search
Start Over
Removal of life support in intensive care units.
- Source :
-
Medicine and law [Med Law] 1994; Vol. 13 (5-6), pp. 489-500. - Publication Year :
- 1994
-
Abstract
- Advancements in techniques of medical technology have made it possible to postpone death, which, in many situations, amounts to nothing more than a protracted process of dying rather than a prolonging of life. This, together with the fact that these techniques are prohibitively expensive has brought to the fore difficult and extremely uncomfortable problems in medical ethics, especially with regard to who should have and who should not have high technology medical treatment. The principles of autonomy and informed consent, in the context of a shared resource such as intensive care, are particularly thorny issues. Normally it is imperative that individuals make their own autonomous decisions in respect of medical treatment but there are times when consent is of secondary importance and when autonomy must of necessity be limited. However, information concerning medical decisions in intensive care should always be freely available to patients and their surrogates.
- Subjects :
- Blood Transfusion legislation & jurisprudence
Brain Death diagnosis
Ethical Theory
Ethics, Medical
Euthanasia legislation & jurisprudence
Health Care Rationing legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Male
Near Drowning therapy
Personal Autonomy
Polyradiculoneuropathy therapy
Quadriplegia therapy
Religion and Medicine
South Africa
Treatment Refusal legislation & jurisprudence
Withholding Treatment
Informed Consent legislation & jurisprudence
Intensive Care Units legislation & jurisprudence
Life Support Care legislation & jurisprudence
Patient Selection
Resource Allocation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0723-1393
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 5-6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Medicine and law
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 7845179