Back to Search Start Over

Piperacillin tazobactam compared with co-amoxiclav, ampicillin plus sulbactam and timentin against beta-lactamase-producing clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca.

Authors :
Traub WH
Leonhard B
Source :
Chemotherapy [Chemotherapy] 1995 Sep-Oct; Vol. 41 (5), pp. 345-52.
Publication Year :
1995

Abstract

A total of 266 enterobacterial isolates (Escherichia coli = 190, Klebsiella pneumoniae = 49, K. oxytoca = 27) were tested for susceptibility (Bauer-Kirby agar disk diffusion test and agar dilution procedure) to ampicillin, ampicillin in 10 micrograms/ml of sulbactam, amoxicillin in 4 micrograms/ml of clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin plus tazobactam (8:1 ratio), ticarcillin and timentin (ticarcillin in 4 micrograms/ml of clavulanic acid). Discrepant results between the two methods of susceptibility testing were categorized as follows: category I = very major [minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) = resistant, disk diffusion = susceptible] category II = major (MIC = susceptible, disk diffusion = resistant), category III = minor (MIC = intermediate susceptibility, disk diffusion = susceptible), category IV = slight (MIC = resistant, disk diffusion = intermediate), category V = minimal (MIC = susceptible, disk diffusion = intermediate) and category VI = negligible (MIC = intermediate, disk diffusion = resistant). The antibiotics, or combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors, yielded the following discrepant results: ampicillin (II = 2, V = 1 and VI = 3), co-amoxiclav (I = 5, III = 25, IV = 1 and V = 3), ampicillin plus sulbactam (I = 5, II = 3, III = 1, V = 19 and VI = 1), piperacillin (II = 15, III = 1, V = 15 and VI = 85), piperacillin plus tazobactam (III = 16, IV = 2, V = 1 and VI = 5) and timentin (I = 2, III = 48 and IV = 1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0009-3157
Volume :
41
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Chemotherapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
8521736
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000239366