Back to Search Start Over

[Our experience of 350 endoscopic polypectomies of the colon].

Authors :
Pesce G
Acampa G
Pontecorvo C
Source :
Minerva chirurgica [Minerva Chir] 1996 Jan-Feb; Vol. 51 (1-2), pp. 39-46.
Publication Year :
1996

Abstract

The authors report their experience of the endoscopic removal of 350 polyps of the colon. Vegetating lesions of doubtful endoscopic appearance and nature were excluded from this study. Indications regarding intestinal cleaning and the most appropriate pharmacological preparation are given on the basis of personal experience. No patient had to be hospitalised and the colon was fully explored in all cases; the cecum was reached in 85% of cases. The maximum limit of endoscopic removal was 5 cm due to the greater risk of complications and presence of cancer on polyps. A total of up to 8 polyps were removed in a single session in cases of multiple polyposis. From 1986 to 1992 350 polypectomies were performed in 177 patients, of which 301 were adenoma (85.9%) and 49 mixed (14.1%). Adenomas were 80.5% tubular, 13.6% tubulo-villous and 4.3% villous. Cancer was found on polyps in 5 cases (1.6%). 146 polyps were found in the rectum (41.8%), 84 in the sigma (24%), 76 in the descending (21.7%), 21 in the transverse (6%), and 23 in the right colon (6.5%). Patients were aged between 3 and 81 years, and the most frequently affected age bracket was between 40-70 years. Follow-up consisted in checks at 6, 12 and 24 months in cases of adenoma and quarterly checks during the first year in the event of carcinoma in situ. The decision to use a diathermic loop or hot biopsy was made in relation to lesion size, reserving the former for polyps with diameters of over 8 mm. All polyps under 5 cm were removed and subjected to histological tests. No cases of early or late complications were reported in the 350 polypectomies performed. The authors indicate the criteria of choice which led to surgical resection of the first instance. In the event of in situ carcinoma, endoscopic removal is considered sufficient provided that it is radical. The following must be evaluated in the case of invasive carcinoma: tumor size, the degree of differentiation, lymphatic or vascular invasion and generic or specific risk factors linked to the individual patient.

Details

Language :
Italian
ISSN :
0026-4733
Volume :
51
Issue :
1-2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Minerva chirurgica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
8677044