Back to Search Start Over

Sensitization to doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cell lines by tamoxifen and megestrol acetate.

Authors :
Panasci L
Jean-Claude BJ
Vasilescu D
Mustafa A
Damian S
Damian Z
Georges E
Liu Z
Batist G
Leyland-Jones B
Source :
Biochemical pharmacology [Biochem Pharmacol] 1996 Oct 11; Vol. 52 (7), pp. 1097-102.
Publication Year :
1996

Abstract

Acquired drug resistance is a major factor in the failure of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer. We determined the ability of megestrol acetate and/or tamoxifen to reverse doxorubicin drug resistance in a doxorubicin-resistant breast cancer line (the human MCF-7/ADR). The cytotoxicity of doxorubicin, megestrol acetate, and/or tamoxifen was determined in the sensitive and resistant cell lines utilizing the sulphorhodamine B assay. Tamoxifen alone produced an IC50 (concentration resulting in 50% inhibition of control growth) of 10.6 microM, whereas megestrol acetate alone resulted in an IC50 of 48.7 microM in the MCF-7/ADR cell line. The IC50 of doxorubicin in MCF-7/ADR was 1.9 microM. Neither megestrol acetate alone nor tamoxifen alone at 1 or 5 microM altered the IC50 of doxorubicin. However, the combination of tamoxifen (1 or 5 microM) and megestrol acetate (1 or 5 microM) synergistically sensitized MCF-7/ADR cells. Additionally, megestrol acetate and tamoxifen inhibited iodoarylazidoprazosin binding to P-glycoprotein, and, in their presence, there was an increased doxorubicin accumulation in the MCF-7/ADR cells. Furthermore, the combination of tamoxifen and megestrol acetate had much less effect on the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in MCF-7 wild-type cells. Clinically achievable concentrations of tamoxifen and megestrol acetate can largely sensitize MCF-7/ADR to doxorubicin. The combination of these three drugs in a clinical trial may be informative.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0006-2952
Volume :
52
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Biochemical pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
8831729
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(96)00456-x