Back to Search Start Over

Osseointegrated implants and orbital defects: U.C.L.A. experience.

Authors :
Nishimura RD
Roumanas E
Moy PK
Sugai T
Freymiller EG
Source :
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [J Prosthet Dent] 1998 Mar; Vol. 79 (3), pp. 304-9.
Publication Year :
1998

Abstract

Purpose: A clinical study of 23 craniofacial implants placed in 8 irradiated and nonirradiated orbital detects was conducted over a 7-year period.<br />Material and Methods: Implant-retained orbital prostheses were fabricated, implant success rate was determined, and the soft tissue responses were recorded at 6-month intervals. As a result of patient death, no data were gathered on three implants. A five-point scale was used to record the health of the peri-implant soft tissues and the patients were followed from 9 to 72 months. The unit of measure was a visit/site that was assigned for each instance an implant site was evaluated. Evaluations were conducted at 6-month intervals, and for the study period, there were 80 visit/sites.<br />Results: The study revealed that 42.5% (34/80) of the visit/sites demonstrated an absence of inflammation; 23.7% (19/80) of visit/sites demonstrated slight redness; 13.8% (11/80) demonstrated peri-implant red and moist tissues; 6.2% (5/80) demonstrated granulation tissue associated with the implants; and 13.8% (11/80) infection of the peri-implant soft tissues was noted. Implant success rate was 35% (7/20); implant success rate in the nonradiated patients was 37.5% (3/8) and the success rate for radiated patients was 33.3% (4/12). Implants placed in the orbital region demonstrated a high failure rate. Most implant failures occurred late as opposed to early in the study period.<br />Conclusion: Orbital implants should be placed in patients who understand that long-term success rates may be low and require meticulous hygiene maintenance.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0022-3913
Volume :
79
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
9553884
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70242-2