Back to Search Start Over

International relations in China and Europe: the case for interregional dialogue in a hegemonic discipline.

Authors :
Kristensen, Peter Marcus
Source :
Pacific Review; May2015, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p161-187, 27p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The international relations (IR) discipline is known as an ‘American Social Science’ dominated by scholars and theories from the US core. This paper compares IR in two noncore settings, China and Europe. It shows that there is a growing institutional and intellectual integration into global Anglophone, mostly American, IR in both Europe and China. Both Chinese and European IR communities have established top Anglophone journals like theEuropean Journal of International Relationsand theChinese Journal of International Politicsto spearhead their integration into mainstream Anglophone IR and carve out a space for regional thinking. Yet, the analysis of their publication and citation patterns shows that IR outside the American core communicates through a hub-and-spokes system where there is always a connection to the American core but rarely very strong linkages to other peripheral regions. The two journals studied thus function as outlets for ‘local’ and American scholars, rely on ‘local’ and American sources, and there is very little integration and exchangebetweenChinese and European IR. Chinese and European IR would benefit from such a dialogue, especially regarding ‘schools’ of IR at the margins of an ‘American social science’. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09512748
Volume :
28
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Pacific Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
101602611
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.948568