Back to Search Start Over

Is it useful to increase dialysate flow rate to improve the delivered Kt?

Authors :
Albalate, Marta
Pérez-García, Rafael
de Sequera, Patricia
Corchete, Elena
Alcazar, Roberto
Ortega, Mayra
Puerta, Marta
Source :
BMC Nephrology; 2015, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p1-6, 6p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Increasing dialysate flow rates (Qd) from 500 to 800 ml/min has been recommended to increase dialysis efficiency. A few publications show that increasing Qd no longer led to an increase in mass transfer area coefficient (KoA) or Kt/V measurement. Our objectives were: 1) Studying the effect in Kt of using a Qd of 400, 500, 700 ml/min and autoflow (AF) with different modern dialysers. 2) Comparing the effect on Kt of water consumption vs. dialysis time to obtain an individual objective of Kt (Ktobj) adjusted to body surface. Methods: This is a prospective single-centre study with crossover design. Thirty-one patients were studied and six sessions with each Qd were performed. HD parameters were acquired directly from the monitor display: effective blood flow rate (Qbe), Qd, effective dialysis time (Te) and measured by conductivity monitoring, final Kt. Results: We studied a total of 637 sessions: 178 with 500 ml/min, 173 with 700 ml/min, 160 with AF and 126 with 400 ml/min. Kt rose a 4% comparing 400 with 500 ml/min, and 3% comparing 500 with 700 ml/min. Ktobj was reached in 82.4, 88.2, 88.2 and 94.1% of patients with 400, AF, 500 and 700 ml/min, respectively. We did not find statistical differences between dialysers. The difference between programmed time and Te was 8′ when Qd was 400 and 500 ml/min and 8.8′ with Qd = 700 ml/min. Calculating an average time loss of eight minutes/session, we can say that a patient loses 24′ weekly, 312′ monthly and 62.4 hours yearly. Identical Kt could be obtained with Qd of 400 and 500 ml/min, increasing dialysis time 9.1′ and saving 20% of dialysate. Conclusions: Our data suggest that increasing Qd over 400 ml/min for these dialysers offers a limited benefit. Increasing time is a better alternative with demonstrated benefits to the patient and also less water consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712369
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Nephrology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
101987088
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0013-9