Back to Search Start Over

Major differences between trifluorophosphine and carbonyl ligands in binuclear cyclopentadienyliron complexes.

Authors :
Gong, Shida
Luo, Qiong
Li, Qian-shu
Xie, Yaoming
Bruce King, R.
Schaefer III, Henry F.
Source :
New Journal of Chemistry; May2015, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p3708-3718, 11p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The cyclopentadienyliron trifluorophosphine hydride CpFe(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>H, in contrast to CpFe(CO)<subscript>2</subscript>H, is a stable compound that can be synthesized by reacting Fe(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>5</subscript> with cyclopentadiene. Theoretical studies on the binuclear Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>n</subscript> (n = 5, 4, 3, 2) derivatives derived from CpFe(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>H indicate the absence of viable structures having PF<subscript>3</subscript> ligands bridging Fe–Fe bonds solely through the phosphorus atom. This contrasts with the analogous Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>(CO)<subscript>n</subscript> systems for which the lowest energy structures have two (for n = 4 and 2) or three (for n = 3) CO groups bridging an iron–iron bond. Higher energy singlet Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>3</subscript> structures have a novel four-electron donor bridging η<superscript>2</superscript>-μ-PF<subscript>3</subscript> ligand bonded to one iron atom through its phosphorus atom and to the other iron atom through a fluorine atom. Other higher energy triplet and singlet Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>2</subscript> structures are of the Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>F<subscript>2</subscript>(μ-PF<subscript>2</subscript>)<subscript>2</subscript> type having terminal fluorine atoms and bridging μ-PF<subscript>2</subscript> ligands. The lowest energy Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>5</subscript> structure is actually Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>3</subscript>(PF<subscript>4</subscript>)(μ-PF<subscript>2</subscript>) with a bridging PF<subscript>2</subscript> group and a terminal PF<subscript>4</subscript> group. Such structures are derived from a Cp<subscript>2</subscript>Fe<subscript>2</subscript>(PF<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>4</subscript>(μ-PF<subscript>3</subscript>) precursor by migration of a fluorine atom from the bridging PF<subscript>3</subscript> group to a terminal PF<subscript>3</subscript> group with a low activation energy barrier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
11440546
Volume :
39
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
New Journal of Chemistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
102487768
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj02348j