Back to Search Start Over

Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential.

Authors :
Winklehner A
Karlo C
Puippe G
Schmidt B
Flohr T
Goetti R
Pfammatter T
Frauenfelder T
Alkadhi H
Winklehner, Anna
Karlo, Christoph
Puippe, Gilbert
Schmidt, Bernhard
Flohr, Thomas
Goetti, Robert
Pfammatter, Thomas
Frauenfelder, Thomas
Alkadhi, Hatem
Source :
European Radiology; Dec2011, Vol. 21 Issue 12, p2521-2526, 6p
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate prospectively, in patients undergoing body CTA, the radiation dose saving potential of raw data-based iterative reconstruction as compared to filtered back projection (FBP).<bold>Methods: </bold>Twenty-five patients underwent thoraco-abdominal CTA with 128-slice dual-source CT, operating both tubes at 120 kV. Full-dose (FD) images were reconstructed with FBP and were compared to half-dose (HD) images with FBP and HD-images with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE), both reconstructed using data from only one tube-detector-system. Image quality and sharpness of the aortic contour were assessed. Vessel attenuation and noise were measured, contrast-to-noise-ratio was calculated.<bold>Results: </bold>Noise as image quality deteriorating artefact occurred in 24/25 (96%) HD-FBP but not in FD-FBP and HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction datasets (p < 0.001). Other artefacts occurred with similar prevalence among the datasets. Sharpness of the aortic contour was higher for FD-FBP and HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction as compared to HD-FBP (p < 0.001). Aortoiliac attenuation was similar among all datasets (p > 0.05). Lowest noise was found for HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction (7.23HU), being 9.4% lower than that in FD-FBP (7.98HU, p < 0.05) and 30.8% lower than in HD-FBP images (10.44HU, p < 0.001). Contrast-to-noise-ratio was lower in HD-FBP (p < 0.001) and higher in HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction (p < 0.001) as compared to FD-FBP.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Intra-individual comparisons of image quality of body CTA suggest that raw data-based iterative reconstruction allows for dose reduction >50% while maintaining image quality. Key Points • Raw data-based iterative reconstruction reduces image noise and improves image quality as compared to filtered back projection • At a similar radiation dose, raw data-based iterative reconstruction improves the sharpness of vessel contours • In body CTA a dose reduction of >50% might be possible when using raw data-based iterative reconstructions, while image quality can be maintained. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09387994
Volume :
21
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
104601632
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2227-y