Back to Search Start Over

The association of HIV susceptibility testing with survival among HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy: a cohort study.

Authors :
Palella FJ Jr
Armon C
Buchacz K
Cole SR
Chmiel JS
Novak RM
Wood K
Moorman AC
Brooks JT
HOPS (HIV Outpatient Study) Investigators
Palella, Frank J Jr
Armon, Carl
Buchacz, Kate
Cole, Stephen R
Chmiel, Joan S
Novak, Richard M
Wood, Kathleen
Moorman, Anne C
Brooks, John T
Source :
Annals of Internal Medicine; 7/21/2009, Vol. 151 Issue 2, p73-84, 12p
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>HIV-1 genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility testing (GPT) optimizes antiretroviral selection, but its effect on survival is unknown.<bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate the association between GPT and survival.<bold>Design: </bold>Cohort study.<bold>Setting: </bold>10 U.S. HIV clinics.<bold>Patients: </bold>2699 HIV-infected patients eligible for GPT (plasma HIV RNA level >1000 copies/mL) seen from 1999 through 2005.<bold>Measurements: </bold>Demographic characteristics, clinical factors, GPT use, all-cause mortality, and crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of GPT with survival.<bold>Results: </bold>Patients were followed for a median of 3.3 years; 915 (34%) had GPT. Patients who had GPT had lower mortality rates than those who did not (2.0 vs. 2.7 deaths per 100 person-years). In standard Cox models, GPT was associated with improved survival (adjusted HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.94]; P = 0.017) after controlling for demographic characteristics, CD4+ cell count, HIV RNA level, and intensity of clinical follow-up. In subgroup analyses, GPT was associated with improved survival for the 2107 highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-experienced patients (2.2 vs. 3.2 deaths per 100 person-years for patients who had GPT vs. those who did not have GPT; adjusted HR, 0.60 [CI, 0.43 to 0.82]; P = 0.002) and for the 921 triple antiretroviral class-experienced patients (2.1 vs. 3.1 deaths per 100 person-years; adjusted HR, 0.61 [CI 0.40 to 0.93]; P = 0.022). Marginal structural models supported associations between GPT and improved survival in the overall cohort (adjusted HR, 0.54; P = 0.001) and in the HAART-experienced group (adjusted HR, 0.56; P = 0.003).<bold>Limitations: </bold>Use of GPT was not randomized. Residual confounding may exist.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Use of GPT was independently associated with improved survival among HAART-experienced patients.<bold>Primary Funding Source: </bold>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034819
Volume :
151
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annals of Internal Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105097605
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-00003