Back to Search Start Over

Brief intervention for medical inpatients with unhealthy alcohol use: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors :
Saitz R
Palfai TP
Cheng DM
Horton NJ
Freedner N
Dukes K
Kraemer KL
Roberts MS
Guerriero RT
Samet JH
Saitz, Richard
Palfai, Tibor P
Cheng, Debbie M
Horton, Nicholas J
Freedner, Naomi
Dukes, Kim
Kraemer, Kevin L
Roberts, Mark S
Guerriero, Rosanne T
Samet, Jeffrey H
Source :
Annals of Internal Medicine; 2/6/2007, Vol. 146 Issue 3, p167-22, 10p
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>The efficacy of brief intervention in reducing alcohol consumption is well established for selected outpatients but not for medical inpatients.<bold>Objective: </bold>To determine whether brief intervention improves alcohol outcomes in medical inpatients who were identified by screening as having unhealthy alcohol use.<bold>Design: </bold>Randomized, controlled trial.<bold>Setting: </bold>Medical service of an urban hospital.<bold>Patients: </bold>341 medical inpatients who were drinking risky amounts of alcohol (defined for eligibility as >14 drinks/wk or > or =5 drinks/occasion for men and >11 drinks/wk or > or =4 drinks/occasion for women and persons > or =66 y); 77% had alcohol dependence as determined by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Alcohol Module.<bold>Intervention: </bold>A 30-minute session of motivational counseling given by trained counselors during a patient's hospitalization (n = 172) versus usual care (n = 169).<bold>Measurements: </bold>Self-reported primary outcomes were receipt of alcohol assistance (for example, alcohol disorders specialty treatment) by 3 months in dependent drinkers and change in the mean number of drinks per day from enrollment to 12 months in all patients.<bold>Results: </bold>The intervention was not significantly associated with receipt of alcohol assistance by 3 months among alcohol-dependent patients (adjusted proportions receiving assistance, 49% for the intervention group and 44% for the control group; intervention-control difference, 5% [95% CI, -8% to 19%]) or with drinks per day at 12 months among all patients (adjusted mean decreases, 1.5 for patients who received the intervention and 3.1 for patients who received usual care; adjusted mean group difference, -1.5 [CI, -3.7 to 0.6]). There was no significant interaction between the intervention and alcohol dependence in statistical models predicting drinks per day (P = 0.24).<bold>Limitations: </bold>Baseline imbalances existed between randomized groups. Patients who received usual care were assessed and advised that they could discuss their drinking with their physicians.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Brief intervention is insufficient for linking medical inpatients with treatment for alcohol dependence and for changing alcohol consumption. Medical inpatients with unhealthy alcohol use require more extensive, tailored alcohol interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034819
Volume :
146
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annals of Internal Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
106260128
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-3-200702060-00005