Back to Search Start Over

Use of inhaled insulin in a basal/bolus insulin regimen in type 1 diabetic subjects: a 6-month, randomized, comparative trial.

Authors :
Skyler JS
Weinstock RS
Raskin P
Yale J
Barrett E
Gerich JE
Gerstein HC
Inhaled Insulin Phase III Type 1 Diabetes Study Group
Skyler, Jay S
Weinstock, Ruth S
Raskin, Philip
Yale, Jean-François
Barrett, Eugene
Gerich, John E
Gerstein, Hertzel C
Source :
Diabetes Care; Jul2005, Vol. 28 Issue 7, p1630-1635, 6p
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>Despite the demonstrated benefits of glycemic control, patient acceptance of basal/bolus insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes has been slow. We investigated whether a basal/bolus insulin regimen involving rapid-acting, dry powder, inhaled insulin could provide glycemic control comparable with a basal/bolus subcutaneous regimen.<bold>Research Design and Methods: </bold>Patients with type 1 diabetes (ages 12-65 years) received twice-daily subcutaneous NPH insulin and were randomized to premeal inhaled insulin (n = 163) or subcutaneous regular insulin (n = 165) for 6 months.<bold>Results: </bold>Mean glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) decreased comparably from baseline in the inhaled and subcutaneous insulin groups (-0.3 and -0.1%, respectively; adjusted difference -0.16% [CI -0.34 to 0.01]), with a similar percentage of subjects achieving A1C <7%. Although 2-h postprandial glucose reductions were comparable between the groups, fasting plasma glucose levels declined more in the inhaled than in the subcutaneous insulin group (adjusted difference -39.5 mg/dl [CI -57.5 to -21.6]). Inhaled insulin was associated with a lower overall hypoglycemia rate but higher severe hypoglycemia rate. The overall hypoglycemia rate (episodes/patient-month) was 9.3 (inhaled) vs. 9.9 (subcutaneous) (risk ratio [RR] 0.94 [CI 0.91-0.97]), and the severe hypoglycemia rate (episodes/100 patient-months) was 6.5 vs. 3.3 (RR 2.00 [CI 1.28-3.12]). Increased insulin antibody serum binding without associated clinical manifestations occurred in the inhaled insulin group. Pulmonary function between the groups was comparable, except for a decline in carbon monoxide-diffusing capacity in the inhaled insulin group without any clinical correlates.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Inhaled insulin may provide an alternative for the management of type 1 diabetes as part of a basal/bolus strategy in patients who are unwilling or unable to use preprandial insulin injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01495992
Volume :
28
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Diabetes Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
106388971
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.7.1630