Back to Search Start Over

Evolving Characteristics and Outcome of Secondary Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL): A Prospective Analysis by the French-Belgian-Swiss APL Group.

Authors :
Braun, Thorsten
Cereja, Sophie
Chevret, Sylvie
Raffoux, Emmanuel
Beaumont, Marie
Detourmignies, Laurence
Pigneux, Arnaud
Thomas, Xavier
Bordessoule, Dominique
Guerci, Agnès
Lamy, Thierry
Recher, Christian
Poiré, Xavier
Tournilhac, Olivier
Spertini, Olivier
Chomienne, Christine
Degos, Laurent
Dombret, Hervé
Adès, Lionel
Fenaux, Pierre
Source :
Cancer (0008543X); Jul2015, Vol. 121 Issue 14, p2393-2399, 7p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of patients with secondary acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have increased in recent years, particularly for those who received treatment with mitoxantrone, and retrospective studies have suggested that their characteristics and outcomes were similar to those of patients with de novo APL. METHODS: The authors investigated patients with de novo and secondary APL who were included in the ongoing APL-2006 trial. Patients with secondary APL who were included in that trial also were compared with a previous retrospective cohort of patients with secondary APL. RESULTS: In the APL-2006 trial, 42 of 280 patients (15%) had secondary APL. Compared with the retrospective cohort, patients with secondary APL in the APL-2006 trial had a lower incidence of prior breast carcinoma (35.7% vs 57%; P = .03) and a higher incidence of prior prostate carcinoma (26.2% vs 4.7%; P < .001). Treatment of the primary tumor in the APL-2006 trial less frequently included combined radiochemotherapy (28.6% vs 47.2%; P = .044) and no mitoxantrone (0% vs 46.7%; P = .016) but more frequently included anthracyclines (53.3% vs 38.3%; P = .015). In the APL-2006 trial, patients who had secondary APL, compared with those who had de novo APL, were older (mean, 60.2 years vs 48.7 years, respectively; P < .0001) but had a similar complete response rate (97.6% vs 90.3%, respectively), cumulative incidence of relapse (0% vs 1.8%, respectively), and overall survival (92.3% vs 90.9%, respectively) at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of secondary APL appears to be stable over time, evolving strategies for the treatment of primary cancers have reduced its occurrence among breast cancer patients but have increased its incidence among patients with prostate cancer. The current results confirm prospectively that patients with secondary APL have characteristics and outcomes similar to those of patients with de novo APL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
121
Issue :
14
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancer (0008543X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
108280523
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29389