Back to Search Start Over

Surgeons' perceptions of transanal endoscopic microsurgery using minilaparoscopic instruments in a simulator: the thinner the better.

Authors :
Araujo, Sergio
Mendes, Carlos
Carvalho, Gustavo
Lyra, Marcos
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques; Aug2015, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p2331-2338, 8p, 3 Color Photographs, 1 Black and White Photograph, 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Several issues have limited the widespread adoption of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). The need for specialized equipment and the steep learning curve represent one of them. To operate on within a 4-cm diameter, rectoscope represents a major technical challenge. However, minilaparoscopic surgery has been introduced to reduce invasiveness and abdominal wall trauma. In TEM, instrument miniaturization may lead to technique optimization. We hypothesized that visualization and maneuverability during TEM performed with 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments would be superior to TEM performed with conventional 5-mm instruments. Methods: Eighteen general and colorectal surgeons with experience with TEM under ten cases were recruited. Two tasks should be accomplished using the TEO-Neoderma simulator. First, using conventional 5-mm TEO curved-tip instruments, a 'polypoid lesion' should be excised. Next, closure of the 'rectal' defect should be undertaken. In the second part, the same participants repeated the same excision/closure tasks using 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments. After tasks conclusion, participants fulfilled an evaluation questionnaire with seven questions regarding visualization and maneuverability when using 3-mm compared to 5-mm instruments. Results: For each one of the seven questions in the questionnaire, the score results were significantly higher for the 3-mm instruments indicating that performance with the 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments in the TEO simulator was in all cases between 'better than expected' and 'much better than expected.' Appropriateness of the diameter of the minilaparoscopic instruments was the best evaluated parameter. The question addressing the ease of performing the tasks in the simulator presented the lowest mean score. Conclusions: The perceptions of participating surgeons indicated that there is better visualization and maneuverability during basic transanal endoscopic microsurgery tasks conducted in a simulator using 3-mm minilaparoscopic instruments when compared to conventional 5-mm instruments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18666817
Volume :
29
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
108378254
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3956-1