Doing good or doing harm: experimental evidence on giving and taking in public good games.

We replicate Andreoni (Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 1-21, )'s finding that agents behave more selfishly when taking from a public account than when giving to a public good. Based on a neutral language setting we add new insights into motivations to give or take in a linear public good setting: we find that Andreoni's result is partly driven by the complete elimination of giving options in the taking frame. However, a pure extension of the action space into the taking domain also leads to a significant increase in selfish behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]