Back to Search Start Over

In-Season Nitrogen Status Sensing in Irrigated Cotton: I. Yields and Nitrogen-15 Recovery.

Authors :
Chua, Teresita T.
Bronson, Kevin F.
Booker, J.D.
Keeling, J. Wayne
Mosier, Arvin R.
Bordovsky, James P.
Lascano, Robert J.
Green, Cary J.
Segarra, Eduardo
Source :
Soil Science Society of America Journal; Sep/Oct2003, Vol. 67 Issue 5, p1428-1438, 11p, 8 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2003

Abstract

Nitrogen recommendations for Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsuturn L.) in the western USA are based on spring soil NO[sup -, sub 3]-N tests. In-season monitoring of plant N status is another approach. Our primary objective was to test spectral reflectance and chlorophyll meter measurements as in-season N decision aids for irrigated cotton, and to compare these with soil test-based N management. The secondary objective was to determine the fate of [sup 15]N as affected by N management and irrigation modes. Urea ammonium nitrate was applied with low energy precision (LEPA) center-pivot, surface drip, and subsurface drip irrigation. Microplots received 3 atom% [sup 15]N. Soil test N application was based on 0- to 60-cm soil NO[sup -, sub 3]-N and 1400 kg lint ha[sup -1] expected yield. Thirty-four kilograms of N per hectare was applied when green vegetative index (GVI) or chlorophyll meter readings relative to well-fertilized plots were <0.95. Lint yield responded to N at Lubbock in 2000 and 2001, but not at Ropesville. Nitrogen applied with in-season monitoring in 2000 at both sites was 34 to 101 kg N ha[sup -1] less than soil test N application of 134 kg ha[sup -1], with similar yields. In Lubbock, 2001 lint yields were near the expected yield, and in three of four cases, N applications with in-season monitoring equaled soil test N applications of 101 kg ha[sup -1]. Nitrogen-15 recovery in plants ranged from 19 to 38%, and was affected by N management in two of three site-years, but not by irrigation. This study indicates that basing N applications on in-season monitoring can reduce N applications in low yielding seasons and match the yield potential in high-yielding seasons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03615995
Volume :
67
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
10962261
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1428