Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Prediction Models for Lynch Syndrome Among Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.
- Source :
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute; Feb2016, Vol. 108 Issue 2, p1-9, 9p, 5 Charts, 3 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Recent guidelines recommend the Lynch Syndrome prediction models MMRPredict, MMRPro, and PREMM1,2,6 for the identification of MMR gene mutation carriers. We compared the predictive performance and clinical usefulness of these prediction models to identify mutation carriers.<bold>Methods: </bold>Pedigree data from CRC patients in 11 North American, European, and Australian cohorts (6 clinic- and 5 population-based sites) were used to calculate predicted probabilities of pathogenic MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 gene mutations by each model and gene-specific predictions by MMRPro and PREMM1,2,6. We examined discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration with observed to expected (O/E) ratio, and clinical usefulness using decision curve analysis to select patients for further evaluation. All statistical tests were two-sided.<bold>Results: </bold>Mutations were detected in 539 of 2304 (23%) individuals from the clinic-based cohorts (237 MLH1, 251 MSH2, 51 MSH6) and 150 of 3451 (4.4%) individuals from the population-based cohorts (47 MLH1, 71 MSH2, 32 MSH6). Discrimination was similar for clinic- and population-based cohorts: AUCs of 0.76 vs 0.77 for MMRPredict, 0.82 vs 0.85 for MMRPro, and 0.85 vs 0.88 for PREMM1,2,6. For clinic- and population-based cohorts, O/E deviated from 1 for MMRPredict (0.38 and 0.31, respectively) and MMRPro (0.62 and 0.36) but were more satisfactory for PREMM1,2,6 (1.0 and 0.70). MMRPro or PREMM1,2,6 predictions were clinically useful at thresholds of 5% or greater and in particular at greater than 15%.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>MMRPro and PREMM1,2,6 can well be used to select CRC patients from genetics clinics or population-based settings for tumor and/or germline testing at a 5% or higher risk. If no MMR deficiency is detected and risk exceeds 15%, we suggest considering additional genetic etiologies for the cause of cancer in the family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- DIAGNOSIS of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
CARRIER proteins
COLON tumors
COMPARATIVE studies
GENEALOGY
GENETIC techniques
RESEARCH methodology
MEDICAL cooperation
GENETIC mutation
PHARMACOKINETICS
PROTEINS
RECTUM tumors
RESEARCH
DNA-binding proteins
EVALUATION research
PREDICTIVE tests
DISEASE prevalence
NUCLEAR proteins
RECEIVER operating characteristic curves
GENETIC carriers
HEREDITARY nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
STATISTICAL models
DISEASE complications
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00278874
- Volume :
- 108
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 113310200
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv308