Back to Search
Start Over
Febrile patients admitted to remote hospitals in Northeastern Kenya: seroprevalence, risk factors and a clinical prediction tool for Q-Fever.
- Source :
- BMC Infectious Diseases; 6/3/2016, Vol. 16, p1-15, 15p, 5 Charts, 1 Graph, 1 Map
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Q fever in Kenya is poorly reported and its surveillance is highly neglected. Standard empiric treatment for febrile patients admitted to hospitals is antimalarials or penicillin-based antibiotics, which have no activity against Coxiella burnetii. This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence and the predisposing risk factors for Q fever infection in febrile patients from a pastoralist population, and derive a model for clinical prediction of febrile patients with acute Q fever.<bold>Methods: </bold>Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from 1067 patients from Northeastern Kenya and their sera tested for IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii antigens by enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Logit models were built for risk factor analysis, and diagnostic prediction score generated and validated in two separate cohorts of patients.<bold>Results: </bold>Overall 204 (19.1 %, 95 % CI: 16.8-21.6) sera were positive for IgG antibodies against phase I and/or phase II antigens or Coxiella burnetii IS1111 by qPCR. Acute Q fever was established in 173 (16.2 %, 95 % CI: 14.1-18.7) patients. Q fever was not suspected by the treating clinicians in any of those patients, instead working diagnosis was fever of unknown origin or common tropical fevers. Exposure to cattle (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.09, 95 % CI: 1.73-5.98), goats (aOR: 3.74, 95 % CI: 2.52-9.40), and animal slaughter (aOR: 1.78, 95 % CI: 1.09-2.91) were significant risk factors. Consumption of unpasteurized cattle milk (aOR: 2.49, 95 % CI: 1.48-4.21) and locally fermented milk products (aOR: 1.66, 95 % CI: 1.19-4.37) were dietary factors associated with seropositivity. Based on regression coefficients, we calculated a diagnostic score with a sensitivity 93.1 % and specificity 76.1 % at cut off value of 2.90: fever >14 days (+3.6), abdominal pain (+0.8), respiratory tract infection (+1.0) and diarrhoea (-1.1).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Q fever is common in febrile Kenyan patients but underappreciated as a cause of community-acquired febrile illness. The utility of Q fever score and screening patients for the risky social-economic and dietary practices can provide a valuable tool to clinicians in identifying patients to strongly consider for detailed Q fever investigation and follow up on admission, and making therapeutic decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- SEROPREVALENCE
Q fever
COXIELLA burnetii
DISEASE risk factors
EPIDEMIOLOGY
PATIENTS
DNA analysis
ANIMAL experimentation
BACTERIAL antigens
COMPARATIVE studies
ENZYME-linked immunosorbent assay
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL research
HOSPITAL care
RESEARCH methodology
MEDICAL cooperation
POLYMERASE chain reaction
RESEARCH
LOGISTIC regression analysis
EVALUATION research
GRAM-negative aerobic bacteria
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14712334
- Volume :
- 16
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BMC Infectious Diseases
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 115925921
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1569-0