Back to Search Start Over

Labour resistance and worker attitudes towards trade union reform in China.

Authors :
Wang, Kan
Source :
Employee Relations; 2016, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p724-740, 17p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose – Drawing its arguments and conclusion from a ten-year survey on workers’ experiences of labour disputes, along with anticipation of trade union reform, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the interaction between labour resistance and its potential for institutional change in the field of labour relations in China. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses a longitudinal cohort study carried out between 2006 and 2015. The survey was conducted every two years, specifically in 2006, 2008, 2011, 2013 and 2015, in Guangdong Province, China. Questionnaire and interview methods were used; 2,166 valid sample questionnaires were collected, and 215 interviews were carried out over the research period. Findings – An increase in collectivized disputes in China has given rise to an escalation of labour action, characterized by wildcat strikes. Joint action has strengthened the bonds among work colleagues, and it has become more important for workers to pay attention to their rights and interests. In terms of organization, two viewpoints towards union reform were revealed: the pragmatist and the idealist perspectives. Workers with greater experience of resistance were more modest in terms of demands for union reform, while workers with some experience called for their union’s independence from the party-state. Research limitations/implications – The data contained industry bias, as too many respondents were from electronics-manufacturing and textile and apparel plants. Originality/value – This paper is original, and increases awareness of the development of the labour movement in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01425455
Volume :
38
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Employee Relations
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
116659398
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2016-0065