The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension VersusMesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial).

MLA

Nager, Charles W., et al. “The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension VersusMesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial).” Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 22, no. 4, July 2016, pp. 182–89. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000270.

APA

Nager, C. W., Zyczynski, H., Rogers, R. G., Barber, M. D., Richter, H. E., Visco, A. G., Rardin, C. R., Harvie, H., Wallace, D., & Meikle, S. F. (2016). The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension VersusMesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial). Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 22(4), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000270

Chicago

Nager, Charles W., Halina Zyczynski, Rebecca G. Rogers, Matthew D. Barber, Holly E. Richter, Anthony G. Visco, Charles R. Rardin, Heidi Harvie, Dennis Wallace, and Susan F. Meikle. 2016. “The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension VersusMesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial).” Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 22 (4): 182–89. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000270.