Back to Search
Start Over
Contingency Fees, Settlement Delay, and Low-Quality Litigation: Empirical Evidence from Two Datasets.
- Source :
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization; Oct2003, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p517-542, 26p
- Publication Year :
- 2003
-
Abstract
- Although flat fees are common for divorces, wills and trusts, and probate, lawyers in personal injury cases generally are paid by contingency fee or at an hourly rate. Arguments have been made that contingency fees increase low-quality, "frivolous" litigation but counterarguments suggest that contingency fees actually limit such litigation and instead it is hourly fees that increase low-quality litigation. Using a difference in differences test and data on a cross section of states in 1992, we test whether legal quality is lower under contingency or hourly fees. We also examine medical malpractice claims in Florida using a time series centered around a law change that limited contingency fees. We also examine the impact of fee arrangements on the expected time to settlement. We find that hourly fees encourage the filing of low-quality suits and increase the time to settlement (i.e., contingency fees increase legal quality and decrease the time to settlement). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 87566222
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 11675178
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewg019