Back to Search Start Over

Cost-effectiveness of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Strategies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase After Generic Entry of Imatinib in the United States.

Authors :
Padula, William V.
Larson, Richard A.
Dusetzina, Stacie B.
Apperley, Jane F.
Hehlmann, Rudiger
Baccarani, Michele
Eigendorff, Ekkehard
Guilhot, Joelle
Guilhot, Francois
Mahon, Francois-Xavier
Martinelli, Giovanni
Mayer, Jiri
Müller, Martin C.
Niederwieser, Dietger
Saussele, Susanne
Schiffer, Charles A.
Silver, Richard T.
Simonsson, Bengt
Conti, Rena M.
Source :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute; Jul2016, Vol. 108 Issue 7, p1-9, 9p, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of treating incident chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with generic imatinib when it becomes available in United States in 2016. In the year following generic entry, imatinib's price is expected to drop 70% to 90%. We hypothesized that initiating treatment with generic imatinib in these patients and then switching to the other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), dasatinib or nilotinib, because of intolerance or lack of effectiveness ("imatinib-first") would be cost-effective compared with the current standard of care: "physicians' choice" of initiating treatment with any one of the three TKIs. Methods: We constructed Markov models to compare the five-year cost-effectiveness of imatinib-first vs physician's choice from a US commercial payer perspective, assuming 3% annual discounting ($US 2013). The models' clinical endpoint was five-year overall survival taken from a systematic review of clinical trial results. Per-person spending on incident CML-CP treatment overall care components was estimated using Truven's MarketScan claims data. The main outcome of the models was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). We interpreted outcomes based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. A panel of European LeukemiaNet experts oversaw the study's conduct. Results: Both strategies met the threshold. Imatinib-first ($277 401, 3.87 QALYs) offered patients a 0.10 decrement in QALYs at a savings of $88 343 over five years to payers compared with physician's choice ($365 744, 3.97 QALYs). The imatinibfirst incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was approximately $883 730/QALY. The results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: When imatinib loses patent protection and its price declines, its use will be the cost-effective initial treatment strategy for CML-CP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00278874
Volume :
108
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
116832894
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw003