Back to Search Start Over

Identifying patients at risk for severe exacerbations of asthma: development and external validation of a multivariable prediction model.

Authors :
Loymans, Rik J. B.
Honkoop, Persijn J.
Termeer, Evelien H.
Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B.
Assendelft, Willem J. J.
Schermer, Tjard R. J.
Kian Fan Chung
Sousa, Ana R.
Sterk, Peter J.
Reddel, Helen K.
Sont, Jacob K.
Riet, Gerben ter
Chung, Kian Fan
Ter Riet, Gerben
Source :
Thorax; Sep2016, Vol. 71 Issue 9, p838-846, 9p, 4 Charts, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Preventing exacerbations of asthma is a major goal in current guidelines. We aimed to develop a prediction model enabling practitioners to identify patients at risk of severe exacerbations who could potentially benefit from a change in management.<bold>Methods: </bold>We used data from a 12-month primary care pragmatic trial; candidate predictors were identified from GINA 2014 and selected with a multivariable bootstrapping procedure. Three models were constructed, based on: (1) history, (2) history+spirometry and (3) history+spirometry+FeNO. Final models were corrected for overoptimism by shrinking the regression coefficients; predictive performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Models were externally validated in a data set including patients with severe asthma (Unbiased BIOmarkers in PREDiction of respiratory disease outcomes).<bold>Results: </bold>80/611 (13.1%) participants experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation. Five predictors (Asthma Control Questionnaire score, current smoking, chronic sinusitis, previous hospital admission for asthma and ≥1 severe exacerbation in the previous year) were retained in the history model (AUROC 0.77 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.80); Hosmer-Lemeshow p value 0.35). Adding spirometry and FeNO subsequently improved discrimination slightly (AUROC 0.79 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.81) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81), respectively). External validation yielded AUROCs of 0.69 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.75; 0.63 to 0.75 and 0.63 to 0.75) for the three models, respectively; calibration was best for the spirometry ­model.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>A simple history-based model extended with spirometry identifies patients who are prone to asthma exacerbations. The additional value of FeNO is modest. These models merit an implementation study in clinical practice to assess their utility.<bold>Trial Registration Number: </bold>NTR 1756. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00406376
Volume :
71
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Thorax
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
117523902
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208138