Back to Search Start Over

Second-trimester urine nephrin:creatinine ratio versus soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1:placental growth factor ratio for prediction of preeclampsia among asymptomatic women.

Authors :
Zhai, Tianyue
Furuta, Itsuko
Nakagawa, Kinuko
Kojima, Takashi
Umazume, Takeshi
Ishikawa, Satoshi
Yamada, Takahiro
Morikawa, Mamoru
Minakami, Hisanori
Source :
Scientific Reports; 11/25/2016, p37442, 1p
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

This prospective observational study compare urine nephrin:creatinine ratio (NCR, ng/mg) with serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1:placental growth factor ratio (FPR, pg/pg) for preeclampsia (PE) prediction among unselected asymptomatic pregnant women in 2<superscript>nd</superscript> trimester. NCR and FPR were determined in 254 paired urine/blood samples collected simultaneously from 254 women at median gestational week (GW) 24 (range, 22-27) without hypertension or significant proteinuria in pregnancy (SPIP). Fifteen (5.9%) developed SPIP and hypertension at GW 34.0 (26.0-38.6) and 35.3 (27.6-38.6), respectively, and were diagnosed with PE at GW 35.7 (27.6-38.6). The 90<superscript>th</superscript> percentile level determined in 239 women normotensive throughout pregnancy gave NCR (139) sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPV) of 60% (9/15) and 27% (9/33), while those for serum FPR (4.85) were 40% (6/15) and 20% (6/30), respectively. Relative risks (95%CI) of later PE were 10.0 (3.82-26.4; 27% [9/33] vs. 2.7% [6/221]) and 4.98 (1.91-13.0; 20% [6/30] vs. 4.0% [9/224]) for NCR-positive and FPR-positive women, respectively. Cut-offs suggested by ROC gave NCR (86.6) sensitivity and PPV of 87% (13/15) and 17% (13/79), and FPR (8.8) values of 40% (6/15) and 40% (6/15), respectively. Thus, 2<superscript>nd</superscript> trimester NCR was superior to FPR for PE prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20452322
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Scientific Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
119803976
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37442