Back to Search
Start Over
A COMPARISON OF HOLE-FILLING METHODS IN 3D.
- Source :
- International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Computer Science; 2016, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p885-903, 19p
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- This paper presents a review of the most relevant current techniques that deal with hole-filling in 3D models. Contrary to earlier reports, which approach mesh repairing in a sparse and global manner, the objective of this review is twofold. First, a specific and comprehensive review of hole-filling techniques (as a relevant part in the field of mesh repairing) is carried out. We present a brief summary of each technique with attention paid to its algorithmic essence, main contributions and limitations. Second, a solid comparison between 34 methods is established. To do this, we define 19 possible meaningful features and properties that can be found in a generic hole-filling process. Then, we use these features to assess the virtues and deficiencies of the method and to build comparative tables. The purpose of this review is to make a comparative hole-filling state-of-the-art available to researchers, showing pros and cons in a common framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- ALGORITHMS
POLYGONS
MATHEMATICAL models
MATHEMATICAL analysis
ANALYSIS of variance
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1641876X
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Computer Science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 120356280
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2016-0063